This opinion piece, "The Plight of African Christians," by Bigalo Chilume, offers one such perspective. (Link via ChristianityT oday.com Weblog.) Pointing out the concerns many African Anglicans had over the consecration of an openly gay bishop, Gene Robinson, in the U.S. Episcopal church, the author also addresses the cultural chasm between African Christianity and the European-North American version that still claims to speak for the rest of the world's Christians.
Traditional Christian teachings frown upon homosexuality, as does African culture. It is against this background that the majority of African Christians, Anglicans in particular, are agonising over the consecration of Gene Robinson. ... Most are horrified, and the consecration was met with harsh condemnation across Africa. The Kenyan Anglican archbishop is reported to have lamented that, "the devil has clearly entered the church. God cannot be mocked".
The majority of Anglican churches in Africa were against the consecration, with the notable exception of the South African church. Obviously, mindful of the provision of his country's constitution, Njongokulu Ndungane, the Archbishop of Cape Town, is reported to have welcomed Robinson into the church's fold: "Robinson has been consecrated by his province and that makes him a bishop of the church".
In white societies, homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle - even same sex marriages are recognised under law and enjoy the same legal rights as heterosexual marriages. Robinson's appearance at his nomination victory celebration with his gay partner by his side didn't cause much of a ripple in the white Christian movement. His consecration had been a foregone conclusion despite spirited opposition from church leaders of non-white races, who make up about 70 percent of the worldwide Anglican membership.
The author also notes that the global majority of Christians must simply "toe the line and conform to the dynamics of the cultural values of their white masters, even if these are at loggerheads with their own African values."
He adds this disturbing comment: "Christianity is a religion of the white race, and therefore impervious to the cultural and social needs of its African and other non-white followers." Lest you think he's focusing only on the issue of gays in the pulpit, the writer also points out the Vatican's "near-hysterical opposition to contraceptives" -- an opposition that "is incomprehensible, to say the least" -- as yet another example of how the institutional church ignores the issues of global Christians. "Widespread poverty in Africa, where economic growth is largely stagnant, at best, makes it absolutely imperative that modern family planning methods be employed to contain runaway population growth; yet, the Roman Catholic Church instructs its many followers in Africa (and other developing parts of the world) not to use contraceptives. What is this?
"Christianity is a white man's religion that he rightly wants to be in tandem with the dynamics of his own culture, and, needless to say, culture evolves over time to accommodate changing needs of society."
Christianity may very well be "a white man's religion" for the time being. The west still has a hold of the power structure, from the Vatican to seminaries to theological journals. But if Jenkins' book is correct, Christianity won't be a white man's religion for much longer. The time is ripe for a global Christianity. But I doubt many of us in the west are ready for the change.